<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Type-Safety on Vishal Chovatiya</title>
    <link>https://vishalchovatiya.github.io/tags/type-safety/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Type-Safety on Vishal Chovatiya</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.128.0</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://vishalchovatiya.github.io/tags/type-safety/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Liskov&#39;s Substitution Principle in C&#43;&#43; | SOLID as a Rock</title>
      <link>https://vishalchovatiya.github.io/posts/liskovs-substitution-principle-in-cpp-solid-as-a-rock/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://vishalchovatiya.github.io/posts/liskovs-substitution-principle-in-cpp-solid-as-a-rock/</guid>
      <description>So you know how to code in general, understand the object-oriented programming, learned C++, and completed at least one Software Development Course (if you’re not there yet, these articles aren&amp;rsquo;t for you). You can write software easily if you know at least one programming language, but is your code any good? Could it be done any better? Is it clean (and what on earth does that mean)? Is your architecture any good?</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
